Google Asked to Purge a Million Search Results a Month
Copyright owners want allegedly infringing links removed from search results in increasing volume, Google says.
These days it’s not unusual for us to receive more than 250,000 requests each week, which is more than what copyright owners asked us to remove in all of 2009Fred von LohmanGoogle Senior Copyright Counsel
The request-for-removal metric is a new one, appearing in the latest version of the report released Thursday.
Top copyright-owning link-killers during March, Google reports, were Microsoft, which asked that more than half a million (546,716) URLs be sanitized from search results; NBC Universal (165,662); BPI -- British Recorded Music Industry -- (151,087); porn site Elegant Angel (41,803); and the RIAA (31,922).
Top targets of the link purgers were filestube.com, with 41,307 contested links; torrentz.eu (22,551); 4shared.com (20,158); torrentreactor.net (18,856); and zippyshare.com (18,844).
Purge Requests Increase
According to Google Senior Copyright Counsel Fred von Lohman, requests for URL purges have been snowballing. "These days it’s not unusual for us to receive more than 250,000 requests each week, which is more than what copyright owners asked us to remove in all of 2009," he writes in a company blog.
Top targets of the link purgers were filestube.com, with 41,307 contested links; torrentz.eu (22,551); 4shared.com (20,158); torrentreactor.net (18,856); and zippyshare.com (18,844)
While requests for URL purges have increased, so has Google's response time to those requests, according to von Lohman. Through the use of improved tools, the company has pared its average processing time for an URL purge request to 11 hours.
He also emphasizes that Google makes efforts to evaluate the validity of infringements claimed by rights holders before sanitizing links in search results.
"[W]e recently rejected two requests from an organization representing a major entertainment company, asking us to remove a search result that linked to a major newspaper’s review of a TV show," he writes. "The requests mistakenly claimed copyright violations of the show, even though there was no infringing content."
"We’ve also seen baseless copyright removal requests being used for anticompetitive purposes, or to remove content unfavorable to a particular person or company from our search results," he adds.
In addition to reviewing purge requests itself, Google also notifies webmasters when their site is targeted by a copyright removal request so they can contest requests themselves.
Requests for link purges are made to Google under authority of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). Since that law was passed in 1998, it has changed very little. That's prompted some groups to call for an overhaul of the law.
Tne area that's changed since passage of the DMCA is how the law treats "jailbreaking" devices. It allows it. However, that's currently under review by the U.S. Patent and Trademark office.
The news of Google designing its own server processors would come as a bitter blow to Intel
We look at what analysts think will come of Instagram’s latest feature. Will it breathe a new lease of life into Facebook’s photo sharing app?Or will it backfire? Read on to find out.
Nokia has obtained permission to sell its Indian handset factory after it agreed to deposit funds as security until a dispute with the country's tax authorities is resolved.
When it comes to security risks, BYOD is the gift that keeps on giving. But what about the devices that your employees used to use, gave up on and, months later, finally dug out of the closet to sell? That's another issue to wrestle with.