Microsoft To Improve Windows Update to Thwart Flame-Like Attacks
Expert knocks the company for vague description of how it plans to 'harden' crucial Windows Update service
After [the collision] attack, the attacker had a certificate that could be used to sign code that chained up to the Microsoft Root Authority and worked on all versions of Windows [emphasis added]Jonathan Nessengineer, Microsoft Security Response Center
The company also described in more detail how Flame's authors were able to spoof Windows Update.
On Sunday, Microsoft acknowledged that Flame -- the super-espionage toolkit that has infected Windows PCs throughout the Middle East, but appears to have been aimed at Iran in particular -- used fraudulent code-signing certificates generated by abusing the company's Terminal Services licensing certificate authority (CA), which is normally used by enterprises to authorize remote desktop services and sessions.
Later, Microsoft also confirmed that those certificates were used to sign bogus updates that were force-fed uninfected PCs by a Flame-compromised computer on the same network.
Researchers at Kaspersky Lab and Symantec used their forensics analyses to more completely describe how Flame managed the feat.
Today, Microsoft said that Flame was able to trick Windows XP machines into accepting the phony Windows Updates once they generated digital certificates with Microsoft's own "signature."
But to dupe Windows Vista and Windows 7 systems, the hackers had to go a step further.
To do that, they leveraged several weaknesses in Microsoft's certificate infrastructure and signing to perform a cryptographic "collision attack," where two different values produce the same cryptographic "hash."
Jonathan Ness, an engineer with the Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC), explained the results.
"After [the collision] attack, the attacker had a certificate that could be used to sign code that chained up to the Microsoft Root Authority and worked on all versions of Windows [emphasis added]," Ness wrote today on the Security Research & Defense blog.
The combination of the flaws in the Terminal Services' CA and the collision attack made it possible for Flame to hoodwink Windows Vista and Windows 7 PCs as well as those running the 11-year-old XP.
Microsoft's Windows Update team also blogged Wednesday to explain how it plans to better secure Windows' default update mechanism, which is used by hundreds of millions of PCs worldwide, to prevent a repeat of the Flame tactic.
An update for Windows Update will be pushed to users later this week that will force the service to acknowledge only certificates issued from a new authority the company will create, and no longer accept other Microsoft-signed digital signatures, as it has since its inception.
The combination of the flaws in the Terminal Services' CA and the collision attack made it possible for Flame to hoodwink Windows Vista and Windows 7 PCs as well as those running the 11-year-old XP
"Second, we are strengthening the communication channel used by Windows Update in a similar way," the blog stated.
Companies that use Windows Server Update Services (WSUS), a Windows Server component and the de facto patching and update mechanism for most businesses, will be updated in a similar fashion.
Andrew Storms, director of security operations at nCircle Security, was disappointed in the lack of detail in Microsoft's explanation of the changes. "They basically admitted that Windows Update was man-in-the-middled, but then said very little about how they are fixing it," Storms said in an interview via instant messaging Wednesday.
"Basically they crossed the certificate streams between Windows Update and other security services in Windows," Storms continued, getting in a reference to Ghost Busters. "Crossing the streams is bad.... Windows Update should have been on an entirely different [certificate] stream than anything else. It's just too darned important to have been intermingled with any other chain of trust, and this shows exactly what can happen."
Wolfgang Kandek, chief technology officer at Qualys, read the Windows Update blog the same way as Storms.
"They fixed the immediate problem by revoking the certificates, but now they need to prevent others from copying Flame's mechanism," said Kandek. "So they're saying that 'We will start to sign updates with Windows Update-specific certificates instead of just any certificates.' Windows Update will be more picky about what certificates it accepts."
Windows PCs that have not applied the certification revocation Microsoft issued last Sunday remain vulnerable to the same kind of attack that Flame demonstrated, Kandek noted.
"Others will reverse-engineer this," he predicted. "It took Microsoft a couple of days to do that, and [some cybercriminals] are just as smart as the guys at Microsoft."
Because updates to Windows Update don't rely on users having set the mechanism to automatically receive and install all fixes, everyone who runs the service will receive the update. Windows Update updates are installed whenever the service is engaged, whether automatically, manually or the in-between mode that only notifies users of impending updates.
Only PC owners who have disabled the service and never use it -- experts have long suspected that users running counterfeit copies of Windows avoid it because they fear being found out -- will not be migrated to the new, more restrictive certificate model.
Microsoft did not set a day this week when it will issue the update for Windows Update.
Since Monday, close to 1,000 workers at an IBM factory in China have been protesting the proposed acquisition, fearing they may lose their jobs if the deal goes through.
Incident responders have no good way of distinguishing inconsequential malware from highly damaging malware. They spend way too much time and resources chasing red herrings while truly malicious activity slips past.
According to AppRiver's unscientific survey of IT security professionals, the ethics and legality of NSA activities is simply not part of the day-to-day concern when it comes to defending against malware and cyber attacks.
Having lots of Wi-Fi networks packed into a condominium or apartment building can hurt everyone's wireless performance, but Stanford University researchers say they've found a way to turn crowding into an advantage.